Comments have been pouring in ever
since Johnson's story hit the internet, it even sparked a serious argument.
Someone strongly believes Johnson's
victims don't deserve to be called innocent victims at all and here is his
argument -
that if Johnson's victims could
willingly and knowingly have unprotected sex with a random stranger they met
online, they deserve to be charged with reckless endangerment, cos they have
just as much of an obligation to protect their sexual health as the HIV
positive person they DELIBERATELY had raw sex with.
